Mandau Symbolism: Spirituality, Aesthetics, and Social Ethics in Contemporary Dayak Culture

Authors

  • Aquarini Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangka Raya
  • Junaidi Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangka Raya
  • Lisnawati Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59784/glosains.v7i3.766

Keywords:

cultural resilience, cultural symbolism, dayak, mandau, sacred ecology, spirituality

Abstract

Background: Dayak culture preserves the Mandau as a symbol of spirituality, identity, and morality. However, modernization has transformed its sacred role into a cultural commodity, highlighting the need to reexamine its philosophical and spiritual significance.

Objective: This research aims to uncover the symbolic meaning of Mandau in the context of cultural identity, ornamental systems, and its social and ethical functions in contemporary Dayak society.

Methods: This study employs an interpretive qualitative approach based on cultural semiotic analysis of literary sources, museum artifacts at the Balanga Museum (Palangka Raya), and secondary ethnographic data from published field studies. Data were analyzed using Barthes' cultural semiotics framework with source triangulation to ensure interpretive validity. Additionally, participatory observation, in-depth interviews with artisans and traditional leaders in Kapuas and Palangka Raya, and artifact analysis at the Balanga Museum were conducted to enrich the ethnographic data.

Results: The findings indicate that Mandau functions as a moral and spiritual medium connecting humans, nature, and ancestors; its material structure and ornamental motifs embody the principle of cosmic balance (duality); and its social functions affirm Mandau’s role as a medium for ecological ethics and cultural resilience. Despite functional transformations under globalization, the symbolic meaning of Mandau persists in contemporary Dayak society.

Conclusion: Preserving the Mandau requires safeguarding both its physical form and cultural meaning. Collaborative efforts among academics, indigenous communities, and cultural institutions, supported by digital education and documentation, are essential to sustain its ethical and spiritual values across generations.

References

Andreastuti, D. (2025). Dayak People’s Spirituality and Local Wisdom in Preserving Nature and Transforming Social Life in Gunung Mas Regency Central Kalimantan. Journal of Religion and Social Transformation, 3(2).

Bella, R., Gujali, A. I., Dewi, R. S., Lion, E., & Maryam, M. (2021). Sistem Masyarakat dan Organisasi Suku Dayak Ngaju (Studi Kasus di Desa Mandomai Kalimantan Tengah). Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 5(2), 364–375.

Berkes, F. (2017). Sacred ecology. Routledge.

Cosido, I. C. (2025). Mandaue’s Political Leader: An Enhanced Culture-Based Framework In The Teaching Of Local History. Diversitas Journal, 10(Special_3), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.48017/dj.v10iSpecial_3.3631

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1533704

Eliade, M. (1959). The sacred and the profane: The nature of religion (Vol. 81). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Halim, A., Basyid, A., & Prihananto, P. (2021). Religious identity transformation: cultural interbreeding between Dayak indigenous culture and Islam. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 15(1), 171–192.

Honneth, A. (1986). The fragmented world of symbolic forms: reflections on Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology of culture. Theory, Culture & Society, 3(3), 55–66.

Kanyan, R. (2022). The semiotics aspect in the dayak motif design: a visual communication study of sign system, the signification, and application among the dayak ethnic groups in borneo.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford university press.

Lizardo, O. (2016). Cultural symbols and cultural power. Qualitative Sociology, 39(2), 199–204.

Magiman, M. M., Bakar, F. A., & Mandal, A. K. (2025). Cultural Expressions of Purity through Religious and Traditional Symbols in Sarawak’s Ethnic Heritage. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 33(6).

Makianggung, M. (2020). the Meaning of Mandau in Dayak Tunjung-Benuaq Tribe in East Kalimantan. Conscientia-Journal on Language, Literature, and Culture, 16(2), 63–76.

Musta’ina, F., Sandra, M., Hidayat, I., Kuramin, S., Suteja, F., & Rosaliza, M. (2017). The Local Wisdom of The Sakai Tribe in Mandau, Bengkalis Regency in Preserving Forest and River: Symbolic Interactionism. ASEAN/Asian Academic Society International Conference Proceeding Series.

Noer, M. U., & Nurbaizura, P. (2016). The Meaning Of Mandau And Sumpit As Weapon Dayak’s Tribe (A Semiotic Approach). Tamaddun, 15(2), 89–98.

Paramarta, I. M., Syakir, S., Na’am, M. F., & Syarif, M. I. (2024). The Semiotics Of Sandung As A Local Cultural Identity Of The Hindu Kaharingan Community In Palangkaraya City. Proceedings of Fine Arts, Literature, Language, and Education, 650–657.

Santosa, H., & Bahtiar, T. (2016). Mandau Senjata Tradisional Sebagai Pelestari Rupa Lingkungan Dayak. Ritme, 2(2), 47–56.

Wati, M., Samjar, D. D., Haviluddin, H., & Alameka, F. (2022). Identifikasi Senjata Tradisional Mandau Suku Dayak Menggunakan Metode Support Vector Machine. METIK Jurnal, 6(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.47002/metik.v6i1.341

Yuwono, B. T. (2023). Mandau Sebagai Identitas Budaya Suku Dayak (Borneo, Indonesia). Memetika: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, 4(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.20961/mjkb.v4i2.79260

Zhang, Q. (2025). Cultural Symbolism and Aesthetic Innovation in Game Concept Art: A Cross Cultural Study. Philosophy and Social Science, 2(9), 27–31.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-16