Traffic Anthropology in Operation Ketupat 2025: Social Practices of Cross-Sectoral Collaboration, Officer Discretion, and Traveler Experience on the Island of Java
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59784/glosains.v7i2.737Keywords:
cross-sectoral collaboration, discretion, operation ketupat, police anthropology, travelersAbstract
Background: Operation Ketupat is an annual national agenda in Indonesia that mobilizes large numbers of travelers and requires intensive cross-institutional coordination. This study investigates the social dynamics, cultural practices, and institutional mechanisms shaping the implementation of Operation Ketupat 2025 through the perspective of police anthropology.
Objective: This study aims to explore how work culture, interagency coordination, and traveler behavior influence the effectiveness of the operation, highlighting the socio-institutional processes that support large-scale traffic management during the 2025 Eid exodus.
Methods: A qualitative ethnographic approach was employed, including in-depth interviews and participant observation conducted across six provinces on the island of Java (Banten, DKI Jakarta, West Java, Central Java, the Special Region of Yogyakarta, and East Java) during the 2025 Eid exodus and return period.
Results: The findings indicate that operational success is shaped by three interrelated dimensions: (1) cross-sectoral collaboration functions as a coordination ritual that builds shared language and institutional trust; (2) field officers exercise discretionary practices and bricolage, improvising solutions amid resource constraints; and (3) travelers act as rational agents by actively navigating traffic regulations, reconstructing safety norms, and demonstrating adaptive capacity. These dimensions reveal that operational effectiveness relies on social relationships and collective adaptation rather than on technology alone.
Conclusion: Operation Ketupat 2025 demonstrates that social relationships embedded in institutional coordination are central to operational success. Cross-sectoral collaboration, officer discretion, and traveler agency form an interconnected socio-institutional system. Policy recommendations include strengthening soft-skills training for field officers, formalizing interagency communication protocols, and implementing structured traveler feedback mechanisms to enhance future large-scale traffic operations.
References
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Aprilia, D. E., & Nugraha, N. P. (2025). Evaluation of Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (ETLE) in Improving Traffic Compliance in Makassar City. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 1500-1510. https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i3.2624
Bafekr, P. (2024). Investigating the Effect of Service Innovation, Response Speed, and Information Transparency on Customer Trust in Travel Agencies of East Gilan Province. Creative Economy and New Business Management Approaches, 76-91.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brodkin, E. Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl_2), i253–i277.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Garing, J., Firdaus, W., Herianah, H., Ridwan, M., Erniati, E., Budiono, S., & Pariela, T. D. (2023). Identifying and resolving conflicts using local wisdom: A qualitative study. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(4), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i3.156
Garriott, W. (Ed.). (2013). Policing and contemporary governance: The anthropology of police in practice. Springer.
Kaparias, I., Liu, P., Tsakarestos, A., Eden, N., Schmitz, P., Hoadley, S., & Hauptmann, S. (2020). Predictive road safety impact assessment of traffic management policies and measures. Case studies on transport policy, 8(2), 508-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.11.004
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Latif, D. A., Muhammad, S., Arifin, S., Nurlela, A., Rahim, H., Tenriliweng, A. A. H., ... & Putra, B. A. (2025). Public perceptions of police service performance in Makassar: cultural and technological influences in an urban southeast Asian context. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1533704. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1533704
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Pinch, P., & Reimer, S. (2012). Moto-mobilities: Geographies of the Motorcycle and Motorcyclists. Mobilities, 7(3), 439-457. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.659466
Rad, E. H., Hosseinnia, M., Mousavi, N., Shekari, A., Kouchakinejad-Eramsadati, L., & Khodadadi-Hassankiadeh, N. (2024). Fatigue in taxi drivers and its relationship with traffic accident history and experiences: a cross-sectional study in the north of Iran. BMC public health, 24(1), 530. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18044-5
Rowe, M. (2020). Policing the police: Challenges of democracy and accountability. Policy Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zhu, H. (2026). Research on Cross-Regional Collaborative Service Mechanisms in Rural Public Management. Economics and Management Innovation, 3(1), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.71222/efr1t975
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bakharuddin Muhammad Syah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
