Identity Dynamics and the Crisis of Women’s Roles Between Modernism and Capitalism: A Critical Analysis of Mission and Family Integrity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59784/glosains.v7i2.679Keywords:
identity crisis, contemporary women, traditional roles, messengers, the five pillars of ethicsAbstract
Background: This article discusses the role struggles and identity crises faced by contemporary women amid the tug-of-war between the demands of modernism and traditional roles. Historically, patriarchal narratives have dominated history, placing women in roles devalued by capitalist production systems, thus giving rise to a sharp dichotomy of roles: economically productive career women versus housewives burdened by domestic syndrome.
Objective: This study aims to deconstruct this dichotomy through the framework of critical gender theory and reconstruct the meaning of women's mission as a normative resolution.
Methods: The method used is a critical content analysis of discourses regarding women's identities and activities.
Results: Key findings show that the ideal image of women today is diverse, overlapping, and even improvisatory, without a clear conceptual standardization. In response to this confusion, the concept of Mission is redefined holistically and non-locationally. It is not measured by its field of work (in the office or at home), but by the orientation of its goals: the improvement of the quality of life, wholeness, and harmony towards a happy and prosperous family.
Conclusion: The implication of this redefinition is an emphasis on conscious and ethical decision-making anchored in family integrity. This study contributes a normative framework demonstrating that women's mission is not determined by the location of work but by its goal: the quality of life, wholeness, and family harmony. Successful mission execution requires adopting five key ethical pillars—openness, dialogue, communicativeness, honesty and loyalty, and responsibility—crucial to prevent family dysfunction caused by role instability.
References
Ali, R., Hartina, H., & Hajrah, H. (2024). Islamic Perspective on the Concept of a Sakinah Family in a Career Family. Experimental Student Experiences, 3(3).
Bauman, Z. (2013). Liquid modernity. John Wiley & Sons.
Breda, T., Jouini, E., Napp, C., & Thebault, G. (2020). Gender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(49). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008704117
Da Silva, T. C., De Medeiros, P. M., Hanazaki, N., Da Fonseca-Kruel, V. S., Hora, J. S. L., & De Medeiros, S. G. (2019). The role of women in Brazilian ethnobiology: Challenges and perspectives. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-019-0322-3
Endendijk, J. J., Groeneveld, M. G., & Mesman, J. (2018). The Gendered Family Process Model: An Integrative Framework of Gender in the Family. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1185-8
Gelber, L., & Leuven, R. (Eds.). (1987). Essays on Woman (Vol. 2). ICS Publications.
Giddens, A. (2009). Runaway World: How Globalization Is Reshaping Our Lives. In Rugman Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28787-8_45
Hidayah, N. (2020). Women’s Movement In The Framework Of Modernist Muslims In Indonesia: Aisyiyah And Economic Empowerment. Hamdard Islamicus, 43. https://doi.org/10.57144/hi.v43iSpecialIssue.218
Huda, H. D., & Dodi, L. (2020). Rethinking peran perempuan dan keadilan gender: Sebuah konstruksi metodologis berbasis sejarah dan perkembangan sosial budaya. CV Cendekia Press.
Husna Srifyan, J., Anzar Aquil, Muntaha Artalim Zaim, & Alqahoom, A. (2023). Women’s Career Islamic Family Law Perspectives. Demak Universal Journal of Islam and Sharia, 1(02). https://doi.org/10.61455/deujis.v1i02.59
Itaanis tianah, & Hanifa, A. I. (2024). The Dual Role of Women in the Household in Larangan Slampar Village, Tlanakan District, Pamekasan Regency. SOCIALE: International Journal of Social Studies, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.19105/sociale.v1i2.15408
Krishnan, A. R., Alias, S. N., & Omar, Z. (2020). Factors Influencing Work-Family Conflict Among Dual-Career Couples: A Research Framework. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i9/7825
Levy, D. J. (2017). Ethics and responsibility in a technological age. In Global Ethics and Moral Responsibility: Hans Jonas and his Critics. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315584829
Mies, M. (2014). Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour. In Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour. https://doi.org/10.2307/4065655
Morgan, M. G., & Jonas, H. (1985). The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics in the Technological Age. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/3324683
Morley, D. (2020). The gendered framework of family viewing. In Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203398357-19
Rahmayanty, D., Rabbani, M. N., & Asrofi, F. (2023). Tantangan Dan Peluang Perempuan Sebagai Pemimpin Dalam Berbagai Industri. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 5(6). https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v5i6.20181
Rapoport, R., & Rapoport, R. N. (2016). Dual-Career Families The Evolution of a Concept. In The Social Engagement of Social Science, Volume 1. https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512819748-019
Setiyanto, D. A. (2020). Discourse of Middle Way in Islamic Jurisprudence on Career Women in Achieving The Sakinah Family: Reconstruction of Roles and Women’s Identity. Justicia Islamica, 17(1).
Tyagi, N., Jha, R. S., Chaudhary, A., & Batar, S. (2021). Women in Dual Role: a Sociological Perspective. Ilkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online, 20(1).
Yarhouse, M., & Sadusky, J. (2020). Emerging gender identities: Understanding the diverse experiences of today's youth. Brazos Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ignasius Welerubun

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA). that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



